Boethius' The Consolation of Philosophy is pervasive throughout Middle English literature and, accordingly, scholarship thereon. The text itself is a dialectical philosophy, following the model of Plato's Republic, in which Boethius laments his plight and is visited by Lady Philosophy. The majority of the text is thus a dialogue between Boethius and Lady Philosophy, in which the latter uses a Socratic approach to push Boethius to the proper conclusions. In the beginning, Boethius attempts to call upon the classic muses, which Lady Philosophy rejects and refers to as harlots. This section early on is interesting in that it suggests that the muses themselves are available to anyone who chooses to utilize them, comprising somewhat sexual language as part of the eventual reason why Boethius should not trust them. This line of discussion runs somewhat similar to the points Diane Cady makes in "The Gender of Money," namely that women, like money, are likely to be exchanged freely unless tightly controlled.
Following the Socratic method, Boethius presents a series of points and positions that he holds that Lady Philosophy systematically breaks down, showing Boethius where he is wrong and leading him by the nose to the positions he should be taking. A large part of this is a rejection of Fortune, who is also treated with gendered and sexualized language. Boethius decries his mistreatment at the hands of Fortune, but Lady Philosophy corrects him, citing Fortune's fickle nature and the subsequent necessity of not putting one's trust in her. The text moves towards a syllogism, which seems somewhat optimistic for a Boethius awaiting a trial that will harshly punish him:
1: Human action is dependent on will and capability.
2: Humans aim towards happiness and good
Conclusion: those who achieve their aim are said to have
power, thus only the good have power.




.jpg)
