Roger Ladd's Antimercantilism in Late Medieval English Literature sets out to correct an error the author sees in current scholarship of Middle English literature, namely the omission of merchants. Ladd indicates that this is beginning to change, but makes a moderately compelling case that scholarship is both explicitly and implicitly predisposed to the three estates model, jumbling merchants into either those who fight, pray, or work depending on the specific needs of critics, who often focus on a sole estate for their studies. Ladd pronounces that he, too, will focus on a single estate, but rather than follow the three estates paradigm he will focus on merchants as an individual estate.
While I found Ladd's text to makes some interesting points on the social position of the late medieval merchant, I agree with Donald Leech's book review in that it seems to be missing Joel Kaye's Economy and Nature in the Fourteenth Century. Moreover, I would say that Ladd's text would benefit largely from more consideration of medieval economic thought, although this is somewhat unfair as some of the texts I would like to see brought in, such as Diana Wood's Medieval Economic Thought, date very close to or after Ladd's own text. Regardless, Ladd is so focused on the social standing of the merchant in his first chapter that, while providing an interesting perspective, seems to be missing a more full consideration of the shifting positions on merchants, a trend that Diana Wood covers in great detail. Regardless, Ladd's text is quite useful in considerations of late medieval merchants, especially in Middle English texts.
No comments:
Post a Comment